Good discussion of the difference between "inflation" and "purchasing power" as used in economic statistics, over at Naked Capitalism. Be sure you read the comments as well.
It turns out when pointy-headed economists and bureaucrats say "inflation", it doesn't mean what you and I think it does. Stupid us! We're really concerned about "purchasing power."
Oh.
So, why don't any of our Bureau of Labor Statistics series measure "purchasing power" then?
Domestic metrics in a global world
I suspect that when the trade deficit becomes ~6% of GDP (as it is about in the United States) and increasingly our economy components have global or other national economies mixed in, we're getting a distorted picture.
Here's another one:
.
So, what we have I think is domestic economic indicators in a globalized world.
I've been reading these other posts and there is a sta, PPP or purchasing power parity.
I found this paper (pdf) interesting in that it states the world bank is arbitrarily calculating Purchasing power to create a poverty line of fiction.
At least in the United States I can believe it. They have the poverty line so low for one person, there is no way that person can afford even a room to rent.
Here(pdf), is the world bank GDP by PPP indicators from 2008. Check this out!
by PPP the nation ranking (top 5) is:
So the next time some a**nut screams about how China and India need our jobs because of all the evil doings in history, present them with this one!