Here Are The Foreign Leaders And Politicians Attending Trump's Inauguration

President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration on Jan. 20 will be the first of its kind to boast foreign heads of state as attendees.

Trump broke with more than a century and a half of tradition to invite a wide array of national leaders and political figures to the inauguration, making the occasion historic not only for Trump, but for the guests as well.

No foreign head of state has attended the U.S. presidential inauguration since at least 1874, when the State Department began recording such things.

Trump has invited a wide array of guests, though some have elected to send proxies in their stead and others have been prevented from attending due to extenuating circumstances.

As Andrew Thornebrooke reports for The Epoch Times, aside from some heads of state and senior foreign dignitaries, the inauguration is slated to be a veritable who’s who of conservative populist leaders from across Europe, who have commonly championed the causes of economic vitality, border security, and traditional culture.

Here’s a look at the foreign leaders and political personalities expected to be in attendance:

Javier Milei, President of Argentina

Milei has made a name for himself among thought leaders for his relentless campaign to cut government spending, eliminate regulations, and pare back the country’s administrative state.

He came to the presidency at a time when Argentina had spent nearly a decade and a half in a deficit, was wracked by a poverty rate above 40 percent, and burdened with an annual inflation that eventually pushed to nearly 300 percent.

Milei has since eliminated 10 of Argentina’s 18 government ministries, capped the salaries of top bureaucrats, and fired 34,000 public employees, cutting government spending by 30 percent. As of Jan. 17, the nation is entering its first year of budget surplus in 14 years.

A political outsider, Milei has found common cause with Trump in both style and substance, and was the first foreign leader to meet with Trump following the president-elect’s victory in November.

Giorgia Meloni, Prime Minister of Italy

Meloni is widely seen as a key mediator between Europe and Trump and shares many policy priorities with the president-elect including a desire to lower taxes, halt illegal immigration, and cut bureaucracy.

A former firebrand turned reformer, Meloni cemented Italy’s strength on the world stage in 2023 when she pulled the nation out of China’s Belt-and-Road Initiative, which has been widely criticized for setting debt traps for participating nations and exerting political influence through the regime’s investments.

Han Zheng, Vice President of the People’s Republic of China

Trump initially invited Chinese Communist Party (CCP) head Xi Jinping to the inauguration in an opening diplomatic gesture between the two rivals.

Xi declined to attend in person but elected to send Han as his envoy.

Han now serves in a largely symbolic role within the Chinese regime, but previously occupied several high-profile positions within the CCP, including on the regime’s Politburo Standing Committee.

During his time as a vice premier, Han was also instrumental in shaping the response of the regime to the unfolding pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong, which ended with the passage of an authoritarian national security law, the mass arrest of political opponents, increased censorship, and an effective erosion of democratic norms in the territory.

Takeshi Iwaya, Foreign Minister of Japan

Iwaya previously served as Japan’s defense minister during the first Trump administration and will be the first Japanese cabinet member to ever attend the swearing-in of a U.S. president.

The minister is also expected to participate in security talks the day after the inauguration with representatives from the member states of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue: Australia, India, Japan, and the United States.

The meeting will likely serve to maintain continuity in security cooperation between the nations amid ongoing tensions with communist China and North Korea.

Earlier in the month, Iwaya also traveled to U.S. allies South Korea and the Philippines to discuss similar security coordination.

Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, External Affairs Minister of India

Jaishankar previously served as foreign minister and ambassador to both the United States and China before becoming external affairs minister.

As India’s foreign minister, he has pushed back on China’s undermining of Indian markets and imbalanced trade practices.

He was also central to developing a deal with the first Trump administration to allow for the sharing of sensitive information and intelligence between the two nations, including access to India’s nautical, aeronautical, and geospatial data, a move that was subsequently condemned by the Chinese Communist Party.

Sarah Knafo, Member of the European Parliament for France

The sole member of France’s conservative Reconquete party in the European Parliament, Knafo has worked to support the president-elect’s return to the White House while also championing limits on immigration from Africa and the Middle East in France.

She is the partner of Eric Zemmour, who will also be in attendance.

Eric Zemmour, President of France’s Reconquete Party

A former journalist and one-time presidential candidate, Zemmour has led the Reconquete party since its founding.

In his current role, Zemmour has pushed for increased border security and clampdowns on illegal immigration, as well as curbs on radical Islamic ideology within France. He has also sought to balance the pan-European movement with a more traditional nationalism, saying that he believes France should remain in the European Union but that its own interests must be met first.

Nigel Farage, Leader of the United Kingdom’s Reform UK Party

Formerly the leader of the UK’s UK Independence Party and orchestrator of Brexit, Farage has also pushed against mass immigration into the UK and sought to eliminate the teaching of transgender ideology in primary schools.

Farage first came to support Trump on the campaign trail in 2016, shortly after securing a victory for Brexit. The two have since supported one another’s apparent focus on national pride and ability to act in the face of overwhelming state and media scrutiny.

Tom Van Grieken, Chairman of Belgium’s Vlaams Belang Party

Van Grieken has led the Flemish independence Vlaams Belang party to an all-time high in public support and has publicly defended Trump on multiple occasions against what he termed European media bias against the president-elect.

Tino Chrupalla, Co-Chair of Germany’s Alternative for Germany (AfD) Party

Chrupalla has helped to lead the AfD since 2021, pushing for policies to curb the flow of predominantly Muslim immigrants into Germany and to initiate mass deportations.

The party recently earned an endorsement from American entrepreneur Elon Musk and appears to be positioning itself as an alternative point of contact in German politics for the incoming administration.

Santiago Abascal, President of Spain’s Vox Party

Abascal helped to lead Vox to its first Parliament seats in 2019 on a platform that called for better border security, the strengthening of a unified Spanish culture, and a focus on traditional Catholic values.

Vox, under Abascal, has publicly supported Trump and his policies during his first term, the 2020 election, and the 2024 election.

Tyler Durden Mon, 01/20/2025 - 09:15

Dollar Crashes On Trump Tariff Report

It seems we were right when we interpreted incoming Treasury Secretary Bessent's comments last week...

This morning, with a few short hours until Trump's swearing in, The Wall Street Journal reports that Trump is planning to issue a broad memorandum Monday that directs federal agencies to study trade policies and evaluate U.S. trade relationships with China and America’s continental neighbors - but stops short of imposing new tariffs on his first day in office, as many trading partners feared.

The Wall Street Journal reviewed a summary of the memo and spoke to Trump’s advisers about it.

A senior Trump policy adviser described the memo as an effort to lay out a vision for Trump’s trade agenda “in a measured way,” suggesting that the incoming president is, at least for now, taking a more deliberative approach to the issue that animated his political campaign.

The memo provides a blueprint for further executive action that Trump may take on trade, the adviser said.

The immediate reaction was a collapse in the dollar...

And a spike higher in S&P futs...

Additionally, the memo directs economic agencies to focus on a few specific trade themes, such as reducing persistent trade deficits - countries that consistently export more to the U.S. than they import from it. And it directs a focus on currency manipulation, which Trump singled out China and Vietnam for during his first term, as well as combating counterfeit products.

Finally, the memo asks agencies to evaluate the feasibility of an “External Revenue Service” - a new federal agency Trump has floated to collect tariff revenue. Exactly how that agency would differ from U.S. Customs and Border Protection, which has held that responsibility for decades, hasn’t been spelled out.

Tyler Durden Mon, 01/20/2025 - 08:46

Trump To Declare National Energy Emergency

President-elect Donald Trump is preparing to unleash a flurry of executive orders later this afternoon, reportedly numbering around 200, to reignite his 'America First' agenda. On the energy front, Trump is expected to declare a national energy emergency to ramp up domestic crude oil and natural gas production to reduce power bill costs for all Americans. 

Later this afternoon, hours after Trump is sworn in, his administration will immediately get to work by declaring a "national energy emergency." According to Bloomberg, citing numerous sources, Trump plans to unleash new oil and gas development on federal lands while reversing the Biden-Harris administration's de-growth climate regulations. 

"While many of the executive actions will simply kick off a lengthy regulatory process, they're set to touch the full spectrum of the US energy industry, from oil fields to car dealerships," Bloomberg noted, adding, "They also underscore Trump's determination to reorient federal government policy behind oil and gas production, a sharp pivot from Biden's efforts to curb fossil fuels." 

Sources familiar with the orders did not specify how many emergency energy orders the incoming administration would issue later this afternoon. The move underscores Trump's commitment to campaign promises, including reducing household energy costs. 

In a separate report, an incoming White House energy adviser told Axios that energy executive actions will create "conditions that facilitate investment, that facilitate job creation, that facilitate the production of America's natural resources, and the result will be lower prices for the American people." 

"National security is a key issue here," the adviser said, adding, "Energy is fundamental to our foreign policy, and reducing American energy production curtails our ability to exercise our foreign policies."

At the Capital One Arena on Sunday, Trump told thousands in the audience, "We're going to be using our emergency powers to allow countries and entrepreneurs and people with a lot of money build big plants, AI plants." 

He continued, "We need double the energy that we already have, and it's going to end up being more than that."

One of the emergency orders focuses on boosting electricity generation across the nation's fragile grid amid soaring load growth forecasts through the end of the decade because of the surge in new AI data centers coming online. 

In "The Next AI Trade," we shared with readers all the drivers of electricity demand growth (including how to profit from this trend) and explained that it's much more than just AI. 

Source: NERC - 2022 Long-Term Reliability Assessment (as of December-2022). Grid Strategies - The Era of Flat Power Demand is Over (as of December-2023).

The incoming energy advisor continued: "We're in an AI race with the People's Republic of China and other nations." 

"It's fundamental that we're able to produce the necessary electricity here in the United States so that we can win that race and protect our nation," the advisor added. 

Axios highlighted that Trump is focused on expediting the construction of fossil fuel infrastructure, including pipelines. The incoming admin is also expected to roll back a slew of Biden-era 'green' policies: 

• A major slowdown of oil and gas leasing in the Gulf of Mexico and new bans in other coastal waters.

• EPA greenhouse gas regulations on power plants, vehicles, and oil and gas infrastructure.

• A "pause" on new LNG export licenses to major markets.

• Restrictions on oil, gas and mineral projects in Alaska.

The big picture is that Trump's imminent energy executive orders will reverse the Biden-Harris administration's radical de-growth climate policies. These policies have been criticized for stifling US economic growth and stoking inflation while China ascends unabated.

Tyler Durden Mon, 01/20/2025 - 08:45

DOJ Sues Walgreens, Alleges It Filled Millions Of Illegal Prescriptions

Authored by Chase Smith via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a civil complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, accusing Walgreens Boots Alliance, Walgreen Co., and subsidiaries of illegally dispensing millions of opioid and other controlled substance prescriptions.

The Walgreens store in Outer Sunset in San Francisco on Jan. 10, 2025. Lear Zhou/The Epoch Times

The suit, announced on Jan. 17, alleges the pharmacy chain violated the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) by knowingly filling prescriptions without a legitimate medical purpose and also violated the False Claims Act (FCA) by seeking reimbursement from federal health care programs for those prescriptions.

“This lawsuit seeks to hold Walgreens accountable for the many years that it failed to meet its obligations when dispensing dangerous opioids and other drugs,” Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brian M. Boynton said in a press release. “Our complaint alleges that Walgreens pharmacists filled millions of controlled substance prescriptions with clear red flags that indicated the prescriptions were highly likely to be unlawful, and that Walgreens systematically pressured its pharmacists to fill prescriptions, including controlled substance prescriptions, without taking the time needed to confirm their validity. These practices allowed millions of opioid pills and other controlled substances to flow illegally out of Walgreens stores.”

According to the complaint, the violations began around August 2012 and continued through the present, with millions of prescriptions allegedly written for opioids and other controlled substances that lacked a valid medical purpose.

The complaint further alleges that Walgreens pharmacists often faced corporate pressure to fill prescriptions quickly, limiting the time needed to verify their legitimacy. The filing contends that these practices contributed to the opioid crisis and, in particularly tragic instances, resulted in patient overdoses and fatalities.

If Walgreens is found liable, it could face civil penalties of up to $80,850 per unlawful prescription under the CSA, along with treble damages for each prescription billed to federal programs in violation of the FCA.

Treble damages are a legal remedy whereby a plaintiff is awarded three times the amount of actual damages and are often used when the defendant’s alleged actions were particularly egregious, according to Cornell Law School.

Multiple U.S. attorneys’ offices around the country are involved in this case, citing concern over the ongoing opioid epidemic. The complaint also highlights four whistleblowers who brought allegations against Walgreens under FCA provisions, which allow private parties to sue on the government’s behalf.

In a statement emailed to The Epoch Times, a Walgreens spokesperson said: “We are asking the court to clarify the responsibilities of pharmacies and pharmacists and to protect against the government’s attempt to enforce arbitrary ‘rules’ that do not appear in any law or regulation and never went through any official rulemaking process. We will not stand by and allow the government to put our pharmacists in a no-win situation, trying to comply with ‘rules’ that simply do not exist.”

The spokesperson said that the company stands behind its pharmacists and dedicated health care professionals who live in the same communities it serves.

“Walgreens has long been a leader in providing education and resources, as well as implementing best-in-class policies and procedures, to help combat opioid misuse and abuse,” the spokesperson said. “We look forward to the opportunity to defend the professionalism and integrity of our pharmacists.”

The government’s complaint follows other enforcement actions against major pharmacy chains alleging similar misconduct. An ongoing suit against Walmart was filed in 2020 while another suit against CVS was filed last month.

The DOJ maintains that the enforcement of both the CSA and FCA is essential to safeguard public health and protect taxpayer-funded programs from abuse.

Tyler Durden Mon, 01/20/2025 - 08:44

Futures Rise, Dollar Tumbles Ahead Of Trump Inauguration

US equity futures are steady as traders await President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration and his first-day policy actions.
Futures contracts on the Nasdaq 100 and Nasdaq flirted with unchanged, but spiked shortly after 8:30 following a WSJ report that Trump will "Lay Out Trade Vision but Won't Impose New Tariffs Yet", which as a reminder we said is the most likely outcome in light of Scott Bessent's last letter to investors.  The cash market is closed on Monday, which means cash bond are also closed.

The dollar meanwhile dropped sharply after the WSJ report that no new tariffs would be immediately announced.

On Sunday, Trump reiterated his plans for a slew of executive actions on his first day in office. He has pledged to delay enforcement of a ban on TikTok, while seeking to boost domestic energy output by invoking emergency powers, Bloomberg News reported.

But investors are also concerned that potential tariffs and trade tensions could derail US growth while pushing up price levels. There are also worries about how any actions on immigration may affect a jobs market that has so far continued to show resilience. Trade negotiations “will keep uncertainty elevated throughout 2025,” said Evercore ISI strategist Julian Emanuel. “Higher volatility is our base case in economic, geopolitical relationships and asset markets.”

Trump’s election victory in November sparked an immediate rally in US stocks as investors bet that potential deregulation and tax cuts could buoy corporate profits. But that advance has since stalled, as traders tempered expectations of the Federal Reserve’s rate reductions. Bond yields have risen, pressuring equity valuations while reflecting persistent worries over inflation.

Concerns over US-China tensions dwindled after Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping held a call on Friday, discussing issues including trade, TikTok and fentanyl. Asian equities advanced on Monday, following a Friday rally in the Nasdaq Golden Dragon China Index. The S&P 500 rose 2.9% last week, its best week since the election.

In Europe, the Stoxx 600 is little changed as gains in bank shares are offset by losses in utilities and real estate. Here are some of the biggest movers on Monday:

• Fagron shares rise as much as 8.4%, the most since October 2023, after the supplier of pharmaceutical materials and equipment was upgraded to buy from hold at both ING and Kepler Cheuvreux
• Belimo shares gain as much as 3.7%, the most in over a month, after the Swiss manufacturer of heating, ventilation and air conditioning equipment reported full year sales that beat estimates
• Judges Scientific shares rise as much as 2.6%, after ending last week at their lowest level since October 2022, with Jefferies analysts saying its latest update should provide some comfort following the recent weakness in the share price
• Pepco shares gain 3.8% after Sky News reported it hired advisers to address a sales slump at Poundland, its British discount retailer
• National Grid shares advance as much as 1.9% after Citi upgrades the utilities company to buy from neutral, noting that political and regulatory support is still robust heading into the RIIO-3 price control period
• Telefonica shares slip as much as 4.3% after the company appointed a new chairman over the weekend following the ejection of Jose Maria Alvarez-Pallete by the Spanish government
• PostNL shares drop as much as 7.1%, hitting their lowest level since March 2020, after the parcel and mail delivery company warned earnings will be lower than previously expected.
• Strabag shares drop as much as 2.5%, most in a month, after the Austrian contstruction company announced late Friday the death of its CEO Klemens Haselsteiner

In FX, the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index tumbled amid thin liquidity conditions after this WSJ headline hit:

• *TRUMP WON'T IMPOSE NEW TARIFFS YET, WSJ CITES MEMO AS SAYING

The euro is the best performing G-10 currency, rising 0.5% against the greenback. The pound rises 0.2%.

Cash treasuries are closed, but Bunds are steady, with German 10-year yields flat at 2.54%. Gilts underperform, pushing UK 10-year borrowing costs higher by 3 bps to 4.69%.

Bitcoin is up ~5% ahead of Donald Trump’s inauguration having spiked earlier in the session to a fresh record high above $109,000. The incoming US president’s debut of his own digital token had rattled crypto markets over the weekend.

In commodities, oil prices decline amid a report that Trump is poised to invoke emergency powers as part of his plan to unleash domestic energy production. Brent crude futures fall 0.5% to $80.40 a barrel. Spot gold rises $6 to $2,709/oz.

 

Tyler Durden Mon, 01/20/2025 - 08:43

The UK's 100-Year Partnership Pact With Ukraine Is Just A Public Relations Stunt

Authored by Andrew Korybko via Substack,

The UK and Ukraine clinched a 100-year partnership pact on Thursday in a development that’s supposed to highlight their enduring commitment to one another, but it’s really just a public relations stunt since the document only rehashes what was previously agreed upon a year ago. The UK extended so-called “security guarantees” to Ukraine on 12 January 2024, which covered everything contained in their latest pact, with the notable exception being that the latter talks about “exploring options” for “military bases”.

While RT importantly drew attention to this, the UK never made a secret about its plans to move in that direction, but the century-long timeframe means that it might not happen in anyone’s lifetime, if at all. This declaration of intent was seemingly timed to coincide with Trump’s return to office since it correspondingly serves morale-boosting purposes among Western and Ukrainian anti-Russian hawks amidst his team’s signals that the US will at least partially disengage from that country moving forward.

Trump’s nominee for Secretary of State Marco Rubio declared during his Senate confirmation hearing the day prior on Wednesday that “This war must end. Everyone should be realistic: Russia, Ukraine, and the US will have to make concessions.” The writing was already on the wall long before that, however, so no one should be surprised. This reinforces the claim that the UK’s 100-year partnership pact with Ukraine, the intent of which was hitherto unknown till this week, is just a superficial response to Trump.

To be sure, some part of their “security guarantees” will probably enter into force, such as more joint arms production. The establishment of a British base in Ukraine is unlikely anytime soon though since it’s unthinkable that Trump would agree to have the US defend the UK per Article 5 if its troops there come under attack by Russia. After all, he wants to partially disengage from Ukraine so as to “Pivot (back) to Asia”, but the aforesaid scenario is a Damocles’ sword preventing that from ever occurring in full.

The British aren’t expected to build such a base without American reassurance that it’ll have their back in that event, but even if they did, it’s almost certain that the US would coerce the UK to back down should London decide to provoke a Cuban-like nuclear brinksmanship scenario if its forces are attacked. That associated clause in their 100-year partnership pact about “exploring” this “option” is therefore the embodiment of this public relations spectacle that might even be forgotten by as early as next week.

In terms of the bigger picture, the UK definitely wants to play a long-term and highly strategic role in Ukraine, but the extent to which it can execute its lofty plans as contained in last January’s “security guarantee” pact and their latest rehash last week largely depends on the US as explained. So long as it successfully disengages from Ukraine at least in part and doesn’t allow for Article 5 to be activated for foreign troops in Ukraine who come under attack from Russia, then these ambitions will be contained.

This observation goes to show just how much the US determines the military-strategic dynamics in post-conflict Ukraine. By behaving responsibly in compromising with Russia, especially if some of the dozen ideas that were proposed at the end of this article here are implemented or at least this proposal here for a demilitarized Trans-Dnieper region, the US can greatly reduce the risk of another war breaking out. The UK wants to further divide-and-rule Europe, but it’ll struggle to succeed if the US isn’t on board.

Tyler Durden Mon, 01/20/2025 - 04:00

Outgoing FBI Director Says China Is 'Defining Threat of Our Generation'

Authored by Tom Ozimek via The Epoch Times,

FBI Director Christopher Wray, who is stepping down from his role at the helm of the agency, has penned a public farewell message in which he delivers a stark assessment of the dangers facing America, while identifying hostile actions by the Chinese regime as “the defining threat of our generation.”

Reflecting on his more than seven years leading the FBI, he wrote in a Jan. 18 op-ed published by Fox News that the threats facing the country are more severe than at any time in his career—and warned they’re about to get worse.

“From where I sit, these threats are more dangerous and complex than at any time I can recall since I began my career in law enforcement almost 30 years ago,” he wrote.

“Looking ahead, the challenges to our security will grow even more daunting, and our margin for error will continue to shrink.”

Adversaries—including cartels, gangs, hackers, hostile nations, and terrorists—are now more resourceful and technologically advanced than ever, Wray warned. Cyberattacks can disrupt critical infrastructure, encrypted apps enable secret terrorist plotting, and cartels exploit global supply chains to produce highly potent drugs that are trafficked across the border and threaten the lives of millions of Americans, he noted.

Terrorism threats are escalating, with foreign and domestic actors inspired by events such as the Hamas terror attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2024, Wray said, adding bad actors are mobilizing quickly and making detection increasingly difficult.

Foreign adversaries such as China, Russia, and Iran are targeting Americans by stealing personal data, conducting cyberattacks on key infrastructure, exploiting businesses, and even exporting repression to U.S. shores.

“The Chinese government, in particular, has engineered an unprecedented effort to gut American innovation, steal our most precious personal data, and meddle in our free and open society. History will mark this as the defining threat of our generation,” Wray wrote.

Wray urged the the United States to prioritize unity and vigilance, warning that the margin for error in combating these threats is shrinking rapidly.

“From my seat, I see serious grown-up threats that demand serious grown-up attention,” he warned.

The outgoing director also praised the actions the FBI has taken in recent years to make the country safer and more secure. He said the agency and its partners have made significant strides in recent years, arresting nearly 50 violent criminals daily, rescuing hundreds of children, and imprisoning numerous predators. They have dismantled gangs, seized enough fentanyl to kill tens of millions of Americans, and prevented cybercriminals from extorting nearly $800 million from potential victims, he said.

The agency has also thwarted numerous terrorist attacks, including plots against places of worship, public events, and communities nationwide, Wray said. He expressed immense pride in the efforts and sacrifices of the FBI’s rank-and-file but warned them against being complacent or distracted by politics.

“Our focus must be on the threats and our work, rather than on what divides us,” he wrote. “We must continue to tackle the dangers facing our country with objectivity, rigor, and professionalism. It’s what the American people expect and deserve.”

Wray’s farewell op-ed was published just days before he steps down as FBI director. He announced his resignation in December.

Wray explained recently that he resigned because President-elect Donald Trump wants a change of leadership at the FBI.

“The president-elect had made clear that he intended to make a change and the law is that that is something he’s able to do for any reason or no reason at all,” Wray said in a CBS interview.

Trump has nominated Kash Patel to head the agency. Calling him a “brilliant lawyer, investigator, and ‘America First’ fighter who has spent his career exposing corruption, defending Justice, and protecting the American people,” Trump expressed confidence that the FBI under Patel’s leadership.

Tyler Durden Sun, 01/19/2025 - 23:20

Supreme Court Will Consider If Maryland Parents Can Opt Children Out Of Pro-LGBT Storybooks

Authored by Matthew Vadum via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The U.S. Supreme Court on Jan. 17 agreed to hear a request from a group of Maryland parents to opt their young children out of having storybooks that promote LGBT lifestyles read to them.

The U.S. Supreme Court in Washington on Jan. 15, 2025. Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times

The court granted the petition in Mahmoud v. Taylor in an unsigned order. No justices dissented, and the court did not explain its decision.

The petition was filed on Sept. 12, 2024, after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit turned away the parents’ request for an injunction to halt the Montgomery County Board of Education’s policy of promoting the books.

The case goes back to November 2022, when the board mandated new “LGBTQ-inclusive” storybooks for elementary school students that promote gender transitions, Pride parades, and same-sex romance between young children.

The board instructed employees responsible for selecting the books to use an “LGBTQ+ Lens” and to question whether “cisnormativity,” “stereotypes,” and “power hierarchies” are “reinforced or disrupted,” the petition said.

Parents were initially told they could opt out on behalf of their children when the storybooks were read, according to the petition. The board changed its policy in March 2023. Beginning with the 2023–2024 academic year, the opt-out policy would no longer be in effect.

“If parents did not like what was taught to their elementary school kids, their only choice was to send them to private school or to homeschool,” the petition said.

Hundreds of parents, largely Eastern Orthodox Christians and Muslims, showed up at board meetings and testified that their respective religions required that young children not be exposed to instruction on gender and sexuality that was inconsistent with their religion.

After “parents emphasized how impressionable young children are and how they lack independent judgment to process such complex and sensitive issues,” the board members accused parents of promoting “hate” and likened them to “white supremacists” and “xenophobes,” according to the petition.

The parents sued after the board declined to accommodate them, arguing that they had a constitutional right to opt out of such instruction.

On Aug. 24, 2023, U.S. District Judge Deborah Boardman denied the parents’ application for an injunction to block the cancellation of the opt-out policy.

A divided Fourth Circuit panel upheld the ruling on May 15, 2024, holding that the parents had failed to demonstrate that an injunction was justified. The panel added that it took no view as to whether the parents would be able to produce enough evidence later in the proceeding to succeed in their case.

The panel also found that there was no evidence that the policy change burdened the parents’ right to free exercise of religion.

Eric Baxter, vice president and senior counsel at the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, which is representing the parents, welcomed the Supreme Court’s decision to take the case.

“Cramming down controversial gender ideology on 3-year-olds without their parents’ permission is an affront to our nation’s traditions, parental rights, and basic human decency.

“The Court must make clear: parents, not the state, should be the ones deciding how and when to introduce their children to sensitive issues about gender and sexuality,” he said in a statement.

It is unclear when the Supreme Court will hear the case.

The Epoch Times reached out for comment to the attorney for the Montgomery County Board of Education, Alan Schoenfeld of Wilmer, Cutler, Pickering, Hale, and Dorr in New York City. No reply was received by publication time.

Tyler Durden Sun, 01/19/2025 - 22:10

Trump To Suspend Security Clearances For CIA Contractors Who Colluded To Discredit Hunter Biden Laptop Story

President-elect Donald Trump will suspend the security clearances of 51 former intelligence officials who were found to have coordinated with the 2020 Biden campaign to discredit credible and serious allegations contained on Hunter Biden's laptop about his family's influence peddling operation.

According to the Fox News, citing a senior administration official, Trump will take action against the so-called "Spies Who Lie," as one of at least 100 executive orders he's expected to sign on his first day back in the Oval Office.

Not only did federal investigators eventually confirm that Hunter's laptop was authentic, a June 2024 report from the House Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of Federal Government and the Permanent Select Subcommittee on Intelligence found that "The 51 former intelligence officials’ Hunter Biden statement was a blatant political operation from the start. It originated with a call from top Biden campaign official—and now Secretary of State—Antony Blinken to former Deputy Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Director Michael Morell.

"The Committees’ investigation revealed that without this outreach from Blinken, Morell would not have written the statement. Indeed, Morell told the Committees that the Blinken phone call “triggered” his intent to write the statement. The statement’s drafters were open about the goal of the project: “[W]e think Trump will attack Biden on the issue at this week’s debate”6 and “we want to give the [Vice President] a talking point to use in response.”

The Committees also found that:

• High ranking CIA officials, up to and including then-CIA Director Gina Haspel, were made aware of the Hunter Biden statement prior to its approval and publication.
• Some of the statement’s signatories, including Michael Morell, were on active contract with the CIA at the time of the Hunter Biden statement’s publication.
• After publication of the Hunter Biden statement, CIA employees internally expressed concern about the statement’s politicized content, acknowledging it was not “helpful to the Agency in the long run.”

It's going to be a fun week, eh?

Tyler Durden Sun, 01/19/2025 - 21:35

North Carolina Voters Confirm Growing National Momentum For Term Limits

Authored by John Tamny via RealClearPolicy,

North Carolina’s legislature recently passed a Congressional Term Limits resolution in bipartisan fashion. The Tar Heel state is the third one in 2024 (joining Louisiana and Tennessee) to make the historic leap. 

Voter momentum favors limiting the amount of time those elected to Congress can serve. Which is a crucial step toward better times ahead.

To see why, simply stop and consider voter disdain for Congress. It’s well known. The latest polls from 2024 indicate that Congress’s approval rating languishes in the 19% range.

Less well known is voter support for congressional term limits. A recent Pew poll revealed that 86% of Democrats and 90% of Republicans favor term limits for Congress. Voter displeasure with Congress and support for term limits are arguably related.

To understand why, readers should never forget that being elected to Congress has little relation to success while in Congress. Those who seek election frequently promise “change” and all manner of plans meant to “throw the bums out” while disrupting “business as usual.” It doesn’t matter if the base of voters swings right or left, people want to be told that their vote will bring about change. Only for reality to mug the would-be change agents.  

Upon being sworn in, the newly elected to Congress quickly realize that they will change little to nothing. And they won’t because power in Congress resides within the hands of the very few, and the very few attain that power through a demonstrated ability to work well with, and raise funds for those they promised to throw out in the first place. Only for a status quo that has authored the growth of more and more government to run roughshod over those promising the change.

It’s been said that time in Congress changes the politician. The analysis is backwards. More realistically, politicians capable of being consistently re-elected change to reflect their evolution from a reformer who reforms nothing to a politician capable of getting things done based on a reasoned view that power rarely finds its way to those who vote no on everything, who want to change how things are done, or both. See former Congressman Ron Paul if you’re confused.

Which explains why term limits are so necessary. What limits terms in Congress limits time in Congress, which means the greatest attribute of term limits is that they would alter the incentives driving the elected.

Precisely because three terms is insufficient time for most any congressman to amass power, there will be reduced desire to acquire power to begin with. In other words, those who arrive in Washington with reform very much on their minds will have less time or reason to morph into the kind of politician that they arrived in Washington to neuter.

Which is why it’s hoped that Louisiana, North Carolina and Tennessee are a signal of a trend. People who run for high office aren’t inherently bad people, but the desire to be consequential once in high office brings out the bad in them. See Congress’s approval rating yet again.

The good news is that the solution to voter disdain for Congress and congressmen can be found in term limits. A lack of them presently warps the incentives of those who arrive in Washington with good intentions, but who quickly realize they must shed their idealistic ways if they want to live up to even a fraction of the idealism that first got them elected.    

John Tamny is editor of RealClearMarkets, President of the Parkview Institute, a senior fellow at the Market Institute, and a senior economic adviser to Applied Finance Advisors (www.appliedfinance.com). His next book is The Deficit Delusion: Why Everything Left, Right and Supply Side Tell You About the National Debt Is Wrong. 

Tyler Durden Sun, 01/19/2025 - 21:00

1xbet ??????? ? ?????????, ????? ??????????? ???? ????? ???????

Content

• ?????? ? ????? ? ???????????? ??????? 1xbet
• Bet ??????? ??????????
• Bet: ????????? ?? ??????????? ?????
• ?????????????? ???? ?? 1xbet
• ????????? ??????????
• ? ????????? ???? ?? 1xbet
• Faq: ??????? ?? ?????????? ???????? ???????
• ?????? ?????????
• Bet ??????? ??? ??? ?????? ?????????? ??????
• ??????? ???????????? ??????? 1xbet
• ??? ?????????? ??????? ?? 1x Bet ?? ???????????? ?????
• ????????? ?????????? ????????? 1xbet
• ??????????? ?????? ??????? ?????????? ????
• ??? ????? 1xbet ??????? ? ?????? ??? ?????? ??????????
• ??????????? ????????? 1xbet
• Bet ??????????? ???? — 1???? ????????? ???????
• ????????? ?? ???????? ???????? ?? 1????
• ??? ????????? ???? ? ???????? ?????? ?? 1 Xbet?
• ?????????????? ?????????? ??????? ?????? 1xbet
• Xbet ???? ? ??????????? ?? ??????? ???????????? ?????
• Bet ??????? ?? ?????????
• ?? ?????? ????????
• Bet ???????
• ??????????? ????? ?????????? ???? ? ???????????
• ?????????? ??????? 1????
• ??? ??? 1xbet ????????
• Bet ? ??????
• Bet
• ??? ????? ????????? ??????? ?? ????????? ?? 1xbet
• ???? ????? ?????????? ? 1xbet? ???????? ? ?????????? ???????
• ??????
• ?????????? ???????? ? ????? ??????????? ? 1?-???

??????? – ??? ???? ?? ?????, ? ??? ???? ?????????, ?? ? ?????? ??????? ? ????. ???? ? ??????????, ??? ?????????? ????????? ?? ???, ????? ????????? ?????????????? ??????????, ????? ???? ??????????? ?????????, ? ?????? ???. ? ????????????? ???? ?????? ??????? ??????, ??????? ?????? ???????????.” “[newline]????? 1xBet ????????? ????? ???????, ??? ??? ??? ? ??????????? ??????, ? ????? ??? ????? ????????? ??????. ????? ????????? ????? ????????? ???????????? ????? ????? ? ?????????, ? ???????????? ??????? ???? ???? ??????? ????? ?????.

• ????? ????? ?????? ????? ????????? ??? ??????? ? ??????? ?????? ??? ?????? ? ??????????.
• ?? ?????? ??????, ??????????? ? ????????, ???????? ?? ?????? — ?????.
• ??? ?????????? ????????-???? ? ???? ????? ?????? ????????? ????????? ?? ?????? ?????.
• Exinvest Limited ??????????? ?????????????????? ?????? ?????? ?????????????????? ?????????????.

????? ??????????? ?????? ????? ?????????????? ?? ????? ?? ?????? ??????? ?????? ???????. ????? ??? ???????? ????????? ??????, ????? ???????? ????? ????? ? ?????? ??????????? ?????? ??????. ????? ??? ?????? ??????? ??????????? ???????? ????????? ?????? ?? ??. ????????????? ?????? ????? ?????? ? ???? ??????? 100 ??????. ? ????? ?????????? ??????? ?? xbet ?????? ??????????? ?????????????? ?????? ????? ??????????” “? ?????? ?? ??? ???? ??????????? ?????, ????????? ??? ???????????. ????? ?? ?????? ?????????? ?????????? ??? ????????, ????? ????? ?? ????????? ???????? ? ??????????? ?????? ? ?????? ?????? ????????.

?????? ? ????? ? ???????????? ??????? 1xbet

??????? ?????” “? ?????????????? ????? ?????????? ? ?????? ???? ??????, ??????????? ?????? ????? ????????? ??????????? ? ???????????? ???????? ??? ???? ? ???????. ????? ????? ?? ??????? 1???? ?????????? ???????? ?????? ? ??????? ????????????? ? ?????????????? ????, ?????????? ? ???????????? ??????????? ?????????? ?????????. ? ???????????????? ????????? ? ?????????? — ??? ????????? ????? ????????? 1xbet.

• ?????? ??-?? ?????????? ??????? ? ????? ?????? ?????????? ?????? ????? ?? ????? ??????????? ?????????? ??????.
• ????? ????, ????????????? ????? ?????????? ????????? ?????????? ??????????? ???????????? ????, ??????? ????? ?????? ????? ???????? ?? ???? ???????.
• ???????? ? ???? ????????????? ???????? ???????? ?????????????.
• ??????????? ????? ??? ?????????? ???????? ? 1xBet — 50 ???????.

?????? ??????? ????????? ??????????? ??????? ?? ???????, ????? ? ??????. ????????? ??????? ?????????? ? ????????? ?????, ??? ?????? ?????????????? ???????????? ????????? ???????. ??? ????????? ???????? ??????? ?????? ? ?????? ?????, ?? ?????????, ???? ?????? ????? ????? ?????????????.

Bet ??????? ??????????

?????????? ????????????? ??????? ? ????????????? ???????????? ?????? ??????, ????? ????????? ?????? ? ??????? ????????. ??? ???????? ????????????? ?????? ???????????? ?????????? (??????? ???????? ??????????????? ?? ?????????????? ??????? ? ???????? ????? ?? ???????? ??????). ?? ?????????? ???????????? ?? ???? ?????? ??? ? Live, ??? ? ? ?????????. ????????? ??? ???, email ? ????? ????? ? ???? ???????? ??? ??????????? ???? ????????????. ?????????????????? ?? ????? 1xBet ????? ?????? ?? ??????????? ?????, ??? ? ? ????? ??????? ???????.

• ??????????? ?????????? ????????? ??????????????? ?????? AppStore.
• ????? ??????? ?????? ???????????? ?????????? ?????????? ?????????????.
• ????? ?????????? ?? ??????? 1???? ?????????? ???????? ?????? ? ??????? ???????????? ? ?????????????? ????, ?????????? ? ??????? ??????????? ?????????? ?????????.
• ? ?????? ??? ???????, ????? ???????????? ? ??????? ???????? ? ??? ??????.

??? ????????? ?????? ??????? ????? ????? ?????????? ??????? ???????. ? ???? ????? ?????? ????? ?? ???????, ??? ???????? ? ??????? ??????. ????? ???????????? ????? ?????? ??????????? ?? ?????????????? ???????. ??? ????? ?? ?????? ??????? ???????? ???????? ?? ???????” “«???????????». ????? ??????????? ??????????????? ?????, ? ??????? ???????????? ???????? ??? ?? ??????? ????????? ???????? ????????.

Bet: ????????? ?? ??????????? ?????

???????????? ??????? ?????????? ?????? ?? ???????? ?? ????? ?????? ?????????? ??????. 1xBet ?????? ????? ???????? ??????????? ?? ???????? ? ????????????. ??? ???? ??????????? ???????? ??????????? ???????? ??????? ??????? ? ?????? ???????? ??????. ???????, ??????? ?? ????? ??????? ? 1XBet, ???????????? ??????????????? ????????.

• ??????? ?????? ???????? ??????????????? ?????? ? ?????? ?????? ? ???????? ????.
• ????????????? ???????? ?????? ????????? ?????? ??????????? ??????, ??????? ????????? ? ????????? ????????? ??????????? ????????????.
• ????????????? ?????? ????? ?????? ? ???? ??????? 100 ??????.
• ? ???????, ????? ?????? ?????? ??????? ????????????? ?????????? ??? ??????? ??????????? ??? ???????????? ??????????? ?? ?? ??? ?????? ??????? ???????? ???????? ??????? ??????.

?????????????? ????? ?????????? ?????? ????? ??????? ????????? ???????. ?????????????? ?? ????????????? ??????? ?????????? ???????? ????????-??????????. ??? ???????? ??????? ?????? ???????????, ?????? ????????? ???? ???? ????? ???????? ????????????? ? ???????? ?????? ? ?????????? ??????????. ????? ????????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ?????? ??????? ????? ????????? ?????????? ?????? ??????????????? ??????? ??????. ? ?????????????? ??????? ??? ??? ???????? ??????? ?????. ??? ?????????? ?????? ?? ???????, ???????? ??????, ?????????? ? ?????? ????????????, ???????? ?????? ??????????????? ?????? ? ???????? ????????? ?????? ?????????.

?????????????? ???? ?? 1xbet

???????????? ??????????? ???????? ???? ????????? ?? ?????? ?????? ???? ??????????? ? 1xBet ???-?????????. ????? ??????????????????? ????? ??????????? ??????? ? ?????? ???????, ??? ????? ????????? ???? ???????. ? ?????? ???? ?????????? ??????, ??????? ??????????? ??????? ????? ? ???????? ? ?????? ????? ??????????.

• ??? ????????? ????????? ???????? ???????? ??????? ????? ???????.
• ??? ???????????? ????? ?????????? ?????? ?? ??????, ??????????? ?? ?????????? ??????? ?????????? ???????? — SBC Awards, Global Gaming Awards ? International Gaming Awards.
• ?? ????? ??????? ???????? ?? ??????? ???????? ? ?????????? ?????.
• ??? ??? ??????????? ?????? ???????? ????????????? ?????? ?? ????.
• ?????? ?? ?????????? ????, ????? ?????????????????? ???????????? ????? ?????????????? ? ????? ??????? ?????? ???????.

??? ??? ????? ?????? 1xBet ??????? ???????? ??????? ??? ?????? ??????-??????. 1xBet — ?????????? ????????? ??? ?????? ?????? ??????, ???????????? ? 2019 ????.

????????? ??????????

? ??? ????????? ?? ????? ???????????? ??????? ?????????? ???????? 500 ???????? ?????? ????? ???????? ???????????. ?? ???????????? ?? ????? ????? ?????? ? ??????? ???????? ???. ???? ?????????? ??? ????????????? ???????? ??????? ?????? ?????????? ? ?????????????? ??????, ?? ? ?????????? ???? ???????????? ????????????. ??? ??????????? ? ???, ??? ??????? ?????????? ???????? ??????????. ????????? ????? ???????? ?????? ???????????, ???? ?????????? ?????????? ??? ???????????. ??????? ?????? ???????? ??????????????? ?????? ? ?????? ?????? ? ???????? ????.

• ?? ????? ????????? ???? ? ??????????? ?????, ??????? ???????, ??????? ???????? ?????? ????????? ????? ?????? ????.
• ????? ?????? ????????? ??????, ????? ? ???????????? ??????? ???? ??????? ? ????? 1xbet.
• ???, ??????? ????????? ????????????? ?????? ?? ?????????? ??????????, ??????? ?????????? ??????.
• ??? ????? ???????? ???????? ?????????? ???????? ??? ????????, ????? ???????? ???????? ?????????????.
• ??????? ?? ?????????? ????? ???????? ? ??????????? ???????????????? ??????????? ??? ????????????? ?????? ?? ?????????? ?? iOS ??? Android.

????? ???????????? ?? ???? ??????? ?? ???????????? ?????? ????????? ??????? ??????? ??? ??????????, ? ???? ????????? ???????????? ?????? – ??? ????? ? ???? 1????. ??? ?????????????? ????? ???????, ?????? ?? ??? ????? ????? ? ???? ??????????????. ??????? ????? ??? ????????????? ??????? ?? ???? ????????? ? ?????? ?????????? ???????????? ??????? ????????????. ????????? ????????? ???????? ?????????? ????? ???? ?????????, ????? ?????? ????? ??????? ?? ???????. ?????? ???????? ? ???????? ??? ? ???????????? ????? ??????????? ? ?????????? ?????????? ??????????.

??? ????????? ???? ?? 1xbet

????? ?????? ??????????? ?????? ???? ??? ????? ???????????????, ????? ????? ?????????? ???? ??????? ?? ???????? ?????. ??????? ????, ?? ????? 1xBet ????????????? ??????????? ????????? ??????? ?????????? ? ?????????? ???? ???????. ?? 1x Bet ?????????? ????? ????? ??????? ? ???? ??????????? ??????? ???????? ?????????????? ?????. ???????????? ???????? 1xbet ?? ????? ???????? ??? ?? ????????????? ???????????? ?? ?????????? ??. ??????????? ??????? ?????? ?? ?????? ??????????? ?????????? ? ????????? ?? ??????? ???????????? ?? ?????????? ??. ?? ?????????? ????????????? ??? ?????????? ??????????, ?????????? ????????? ??? ?? (??????? ??? ????????-?????????? ??????????) ? ?????????? ??? ?????????? ??? ?????????.

• ?? ?????? ??????????? ??????? ????????????? ?????? — ?? ???? ????? ??????.
• ?” “??? ????? ??-?? ?????????????? ???????????????? ??????????????? ????????? ?????????? ???????? ????????? ??????????? ????? ?????? ? ???? ????????.
• 1xBet ??????? — ??? ?????????????? ?????, ??????? ?????????? ?? ?? ??????, ?????? ? 1xBet.
• ? ????? ????? ?? ?????? ???????? ???? ?????????? ???????????? ?????????.
• ?? 1xBet ???? ???????? ? 2007 ???? ?????? ?? ????????? ??????????????? ????? ????? ????? ??????? ????????????? ??????? ?? ???? ????.
• ??? ?????????? ? ???? ?????????? ??????, ??????? ??????? ???????? ???? ????? ???????????.

???????? 1xBet ????? ????? ??????????. 1xBet ?????????? ?????????? ????????? ?????????? ??? ????? ???????????? ????????, ??????? ???? ??????????????? ????????????? ????????. 1xBet ???????? ? ? ???????????? ???????????? ???, ????? ?????????? ????? ???????? ????? ??????? ???????? ???????? ????????.

Faq: ???????? ?? ?????????? ??????? ???????

??????? ?? ? ?????????????????? ??? ???????? ????? ????????, ?? ? ???, ??? ? ???????? ?? ???????????? ????????. ????? ????????? ????? ???????, ????? ??????? ?????????? ?? ? ????? ???? ????? ????? ?? ???? ???????? ? ????????? ? ???????? ?????????????. ????? ?????, ??????????? ?????? ?? ?????? ??????? ??????????????, ??????????? ? ?????? ????????? ???????? ????? ??????????? ????? ??? Telegram-?????. ??????? – ??? ?????? ????? ????? (?????????? ??? ???? ?? ?????, ? ??? ????), ??????? ????? ???????????? ?????. ????? ????? ???????? ???????? ?????????? ???????? ??? ????????, ????? ?? ???????? ?????????????.

• ??????? ???? ???????? ????????? ? ?????? ???????? ?? ??????? ????.
• ????? ????? ????? ???????? ?????? ? ?????? ?????????, ????? ?????? ??????, ????????? ????, ?????? ??????? ? ??????????? ? ?????? ??.
• ??????????? ????? ? ?????, ???? ???????????? ??????? ????????????, ????? ????????? ???????? ?????? ? ???????????? ??????????? ?????????.
• ??????? ?? ????? ??????????, ?? ??? ????????? ???? ???????? ???????? 13%.
• ? ????????? ????? ???????, ????? ??????? ?????????? ?? ? ???? ???? ????? ???? ?? ???? ???????? ? ????????? ?? ???????? ?????????????.

? ?? 1xBet ?????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ? ????????, ????? ??????? ????????????? ? ???????????. ????? ???????????? ?????????? ??????????? ????????? ?????????? ? ??????????? ??? ?????? ????????? ?? ?????????? ?????????????. 1xbet — ???????????? ???????, ??????? ????????? ?????? ? ?????? ????????????. ? ?????? ??? ???????, ????? ???????????? ?????? ??????? ???????? ? ??? ??????. ?????? ??????? ????? ?????????? ??????? ?????????? ????? ? ??????????? ???????????.

?????? ?????????

??? ????? ? ?????? ????????? ?????????????? ???????? ???????? ???????????. ??? ?????????? ? ???? ?????????? ??????, ??????? ??????? ???????? ???? ????? ???????????. ??? ???????? ???????? ?? ????????? ????? ?????? ???, ??????? ??????? ?? ????????? ??????????????.

• ? ????? ?? ???????? ????????????? ??????, ????????? ?????? ?????, ??????? ????????? ?????????.
• ??? ???????? ?????? ????????? ?????, ?????? ? ??? ?????.
• ?? ????????? ?????? ? ?? ??????? ??? ???????????? ????? ??????? ? ???????????? ???????? ????????? ????????? 1xbet.
• ??????? ??? ????????, ?????? ?? ?????? ?? ????? ?????? ????????? ??????????? ? ????.

?????? ??????????? ???? ?? ???????????? ??? ????????? ??” “??, ??????? ?????????? ??????????? ???????? ?????? ?? ???????. ????? ?????? ??????? – ??? ????????????? ???????????? ?????????? ??? ???????? ???? ????, ??????? ?????????? ??????? ?? ??????????? ?????. ??? ??????? ??????????, ??????? ? ?????? ????????? ????????? ??????? ?????????????? ??????? ? ????????????? ???????????? ? ??? ??? ??????????? ?????????????? ??????? ?? ????.

Bet ??????? ??? ??? ?????? ?????????? ??????

????????????? ????????? 1xBet ?????? ???????? ?? ???????????. ?? 1xBet ?????????? ??????? ????? ?????????? ???????, ?? ?? ????? ???????. ??? ???????? ?????? ??? ??????????????? ?? ????????, ??????? ????????????? ? ?????????? ???????. ????? ????? ????? ?????? ??? ?? ?????????? ?????????? ??????????, ?? ??? ??????, ????, ?????? ? ??????? ? ??????. ?????? ??????????? ????????? ???????? ????, ? ????? ???????? ???????. ?????????????? ? 1????? ? ???? ??????? ???????? ??????????.

• ??? ????????? ??????? ?????? ?????? ??????, ???????? ?????? ?????????? ?????? ??? ?????? ? ??????.
• ????????? ????? ???????????? ?? ??????????? ??????????? ? ?????????? ??????? ? ????? ?????????? ???????.
• ????? ???????? ???? ????????? ?????? ? ??????? ?? ?????????.
• ??????????? ??????????? ????????????? 1xbet, ?????? ?????? ????? ? ???????, ????? ??? ???? ??? ? ???????????? ? ??????? ??????? ????? ????????????? ?????.
• ?????? ? ?????? ?????? ??????? ?????????? ???????????? ??????? 1xBet, ????? ???????? ?? ???? ?????????.

?????? ? 2018 – 2019 ????? ???????? ??? ??????? ??????” “? ?????? ????? ?????? ????????? (?? ??????????? ????????????????? ???????????). ?????? ????? ???? ???????????????? ? ?????? ????????? ???????. ?? ???? ???????????? ????? ??????? ? ?? ???????????? ????, ? ? ??????? ??????? ??? ?????????? ?????? ????????? ????????, ??? ?????? ?????? ?? ????? ???????. ????? ?????? ?????? ??????, ?????? ?????????? ?????? ??????????? 1xBet. ????? ??????????? ?? ???????? ?????? ?? ???? ???????? ?????, ??????? ???????????? ??????????? ? ?????? ??? ????? ?????????????. ?????????????? ????? ???-??????? ?? ?? ????? ??????? ?? ??????????? ????? – ?????????? ????????? ?? ??????? ?? ??????? ??????.

??????? ???????????? ??????? 1xbet

? ?????, ???????????? ??????? 1???? ??????? ??????? ??????????? ?????????. ??” “?????, ??????? ????????? ?? ?????????? ??????, ???????? ????????? ????????????? ????????? ??????????? ???????????. ???????????? ???????? 1xBet ????????? ?????? ? ??????? ?????? ?????????? ?????????, ? ????? ??? — ???-??????, ????????? ????, ?????????? ?? ??? ? Telegram.

• ? ??? ??? ????????? ????????? — ?????? ???????? ??????? ????? ????????.
• ? ??? ????????? ?? ????? ???????????? ??????? ?????????? ???????? 500 ???????? ?????? ????? ???????? ???????????.
• ?????? ???????????? ? ???????????, ??? ? ??? ????? ????? ????????? ???? 1XBET.
• ??? ??????? ?????? ??????? ????? ????? ?????????? ??????? ???????.
• ??????? ???? ?? ???? ???????????? ??????? ????? ?? ?????????.

??????? ???? ????? ??????????, ?????? ??? ????????? ???????? ???????? ???????? 13%. ????????????? ????????? ?????????? ????????????? ???????? ????????????????? ? ????????????. ?????????? ???????????? ? ?????? ?????, ?? ????????? ????? ????????? 5 ?????. ????? ?????????? ? ??????????? ??????????? ?????????, ???? ???????? ????? ??????, ?? ?????????? ??? ? ???.

??? ?????????? ??????? ?? 1x Bet ?? ???????????? ?????

?? ? ?????? ????????? ?????? ?? e‑mail, ? ? ??? — ??????” “??? ????????? ????????. ????????? ?? ???, ???????????? ????? ?? ???????? ? ???? ??????? ???????. ??? ??????? ? ?????? ??????? ??????????? — ???????????.

? ????????, ??????????? ?????????, ?????? ??????? ??? ??????????? ?????, ???? ????? ???????? ???????????? ???????????? ?????. ????? ?????? ?????????? ????? ??????? ?? ??????? – ?? ????????? ????????. ????? ??????? ?????????????? ????? ?????????? ?????? ?? ????? ???????. ???? ???? ?????? ???????, ? ?? ????????? ?????? ????? ?? ?????????? ????? ???????.

????????? ?????????? ????????? 1xbet

1xbet, ????? ?????????? ??????? ?????? ?????? ? ???????? 1xbet ? ????? ????? ??????????. ?? ????? ???????????? ????? ?? ? ?????? ??????, ?????? ? ?????? ? ?????? ? ???? ? ????????? ????????, ???????????? ?????????????? ?????? ?????????? ?????????????. ???????? ????????? ?????? ? ?????, ??????? ???? ???? ???????????, ????????, ???-???????, ??????????????? ?????????? ? ?????? ??????????. ??? ???????, ????? ????????? ??????????? ?? ????????? ???????, ?? ????????? ??????????????????? ??????.

• ??? ???????? ???????? ???????, ???? 1xBet ?????????? ? ????? ????
• ?????????????? ???? ??????????? ?? ??????? ?? ??????????? ?? ?? ????????????, ???????? ???????????.
• ????? ??????????? ?????? ????? ?????????????? ?? ????? ?? ?????? ??????? ?????? ???????.
• 1xBet ??????? ????????? ??????? ???????? ?????? ??????? ???????? 1xbet, ?? ???????????

????? ?????? ?????????? ??????????? ?? ???????????? ??????????, ????? ???????????? ?? ?????? ???????, ???? ? ?????? ?? ????? ??????????? ????????????????. ???? ???????? ??? ??????? ???????? ??????????? ???????? ?? ????????? ??????????, ?? ??? ????? ????? ??????? ? ?????????? ??????????. ????? ?????? ??????, ??? ????? ??????? ??????? ?????? ???? ????????????. ????? ????????? ????????? ???????, ???? ????? ?????? ???????.

??????????? ????? ??????? ?????????? ????

? 1xBet ????????????? ????? 5 ??????, ??????? ???????????? ???? ?????????? ????? ?????, ?? ??????????? ???????? ?????? ???????? ???????. ??? ??? ????? ?????????? ??? ???? ?????????????? ???????. ? ?????????? ????? ???????? ??? ????? ????????????? ?????????? ?? ?????? ??? ???????? 1xBet. ??? ???? ???????? ????????? ????????? ?????? ??????????????? ?????. ??? ??????? ?? ??????? ??????????? ????? ???? ????? ???????.

??? ???????????? ??? ?????????? ?????? ?? ??????, ??????????? ?? ?????????? ??????? ??????????? ???????? — SBC Awards, Global Gaming Awards ? International Gaming Awards. ????????? 2019 ???? ?? 1???? ???????? ??????????? ???????-????????? ?? “?????????”. ????????? ??? ?????????? ? ???????? ??????? ???????? ip-????? ????????????, ???????? ???????? ??????????. ??? ??????????? ????? ??????????? ?????????? ???????????? ? proxy-???????. ????????????? ???????? ?? ??????? ?????? ???-??????? ?? ????? ???????????? ??????? 1 ?? ??????????? ???, ????????, ?????. ??? ????????????? VPN ????????? ??????????? ??????????? ?????? ?? ?????, ? ????? ??????-?????????.

??? ????? 1xbet ??????? ? ?????? ??? ??? ??????????

??? ?????????, ? ???????? ?????????? 1xBet — ??????, ???????????? ?? ?????????? ? 40 ????? ???????? ? ?????????. ?? ????? ?????????????, ?? ?????????? ? ????????, ??????????? ??????? ??????? ?? ??????, ??????? ??? ?? ?????????. ? ???, ? ???? ??????, ???????? ??? ??????? ?? ?????????? ????????????? – ?????????? ????????? ? ??.

? ??????-???? ???????????? ??? ?????????????. 1xBet ??????? — ??? ?????????????? ?????, ??????? ?????????? ??? ?? ??????, ?? ? 1xBet. ??? ???????? ???????? ???????????, ???? 1xBet ?????????? ? ????? ?????? ??? ???????. 1xBet ??????? ????? ??? ?? ??????, ???????????? ?